<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Fooling Around</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alax.info/blog/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alax.info/blog</link>
	<description>// Software Production Line</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 15:50:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IP Video Source: 64-bit version, resolution flexibility, Adobe FMLE by Burnzzzzz</title>
		<link>http://alax.info/blog/1223/comment-page-1#comment-5986</link>
		<dc:creator>Burnzzzzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 15:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alax.info/blog/?p=1223#comment-5986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

Just wondering if you&#039;ve made any progress on the RTSP h.264 filter? I have been checking your blog often but no luck.

I would be willing to pay you if it would speed up the process of getting this to work, I have been using work arounds for months but little to no luck.

Thanks
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Just wondering if you&#8217;ve made any progress on the RTSP h.264 filter? I have been checking your blog often but no luck.</p>
<p>I would be willing to pay you if it would speed up the process of getting this to work, I have been using work arounds for months but little to no luck.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bringing virtual DirectShow devices back to life with Skype 6 by Roman</title>
		<link>http://alax.info/blog/1433/comment-page-1#comment-5985</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 10:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alax.info/blog/?p=1433#comment-5985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thank you for following up.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for following up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bringing virtual DirectShow devices back to life with Skype 6 by Asgard324</title>
		<link>http://alax.info/blog/1433/comment-page-1#comment-5984</link>
		<dc:creator>Asgard324</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 09:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alax.info/blog/?p=1433#comment-5984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: 
There is a 6.5 beta version available now ( http://www.filehippo.com/de/download_skype/download/52aa483e54098a14342dc818a8bdb9cd/ (6.5.0.107 Beta)) which at least detects my webcam (LogiLink UA0072 bzw. Sonix 001) flawlessly again.

On my other computer, I have a Hama Spy Protect (53950) which had the same problem (was not detected by 6.3). I am going to check how it goes there, in the next few days :)

Beste Grüße
DAC324
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update:<br />
There is a 6.5 beta version available now ( <a href="http://www.filehippo.com/de/download_skype/download/52aa483e54098a14342dc818a8bdb9cd/" rel="nofollow">http://www.filehippo.com/de/download_skype/download/52aa483e54098a14342dc818a8bdb9cd/</a> (6.5.0.107 Beta)) which at least detects my webcam (LogiLink UA0072 bzw. Sonix 001) flawlessly again.</p>
<p>On my other computer, I have a Hama Spy Protect (53950) which had the same problem (was not detected by 6.3). I am going to check how it goes there, in the next few days :)</p>
<p>Beste Grüße<br />
DAC324</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bringing virtual DirectShow devices back to life with Skype 6 by Asgard324</title>
		<link>http://alax.info/blog/1433/comment-page-1#comment-5983</link>
		<dc:creator>Asgard324</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alax.info/blog/?p=1433#comment-5983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed - it seems to be exactly like you are assuming. Starting with the 6.2 versions, some tings were broken again. According to this post ( http://community.skype.com/t5/Video-on-Windows/Skype-not-recognizing-my-webcam-help-please/m-p/1551711/highlight/true#M13725 ) in the Skype forum, a new &quot;Video Engine&quot; was introduced with 6.2 which possibly is the reason for the current Skype version not working with many cams any longer.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed &#8211; it seems to be exactly like you are assuming. Starting with the 6.2 versions, some tings were broken again. According to this post ( <a href="http://community.skype.com/t5/Video-on-Windows/Skype-not-recognizing-my-webcam-help-please/m-p/1551711/highlight/true#M13725" rel="nofollow">http://community.skype.com/t5/Video-on-Windows/Skype-not-recognizing-my-webcam-help-please/m-p/1551711/highlight/true#M13725</a> ) in the Skype forum, a new &#8220;Video Engine&#8221; was introduced with 6.2 which possibly is the reason for the current Skype version not working with many cams any longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IP Video Source: 64-bit version, resolution flexibility, Adobe FMLE by Roman</title>
		<link>http://alax.info/blog/1223/comment-page-1#comment-5982</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 06:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alax.info/blog/?p=1223#comment-5982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The configuration setting are equal for 32 and 64 bit versions. Once set up, you can use GraphEdit tool or AMCap sample from Windows SDK to make sure video streaming is correct. Windows SDK provides those in both 32 and 64 bit versions.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The configuration setting are equal for 32 and 64 bit versions. Once set up, you can use GraphEdit tool or AMCap sample from Windows SDK to make sure video streaming is correct. Windows SDK provides those in both 32 and 64 bit versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IP Video Source: 64-bit version, resolution flexibility, Adobe FMLE by kotesh</title>
		<link>http://alax.info/blog/1223/comment-page-1#comment-5981</link>
		<dc:creator>kotesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 06:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alax.info/blog/?p=1223#comment-5981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all thanks for u r help .........
what are the software requirments for the ipideosource 64bit.bcz after intialise the channel how we are test whether the channel is working or not?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all thanks for u r help &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
what are the software requirments for the ipideosource 64bit.bcz after intialise the channel how we are test whether the channel is working or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IP Video Source: 64-bit version, resolution flexibility, Adobe FMLE by Roman</title>
		<link>http://alax.info/blog/1223/comment-page-1#comment-5980</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alax.info/blog/?p=1223#comment-5980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The software is available &quot;as is&quot;. If you can interface it to Matlab and it works for you, then you are good to go. Your feedback on this is welcome here as well.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The software is available &#8220;as is&#8221;. If you can interface it to Matlab and it works for you, then you are good to go. Your feedback on this is welcome here as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IP Video Source: 64-bit version, resolution flexibility, Adobe FMLE by kotesh</title>
		<link>http://alax.info/blog/1223/comment-page-1#comment-5979</link>
		<dc:creator>kotesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alax.info/blog/?p=1223#comment-5979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i need to know complete working of this software because i need to interface the ipcamera to matlab
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i need to know complete working of this software because i need to interface the ipcamera to matlab</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bringing virtual DirectShow devices back to life with Skype 6 by Roman</title>
		<link>http://alax.info/blog/1433/comment-page-1#comment-5978</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alax.info/blog/?p=1433#comment-5978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Alright, it&#039;s hard to tell what&#039;s wrong from quick look but what I see that SOME virtual cameras disappeared, and some are still in their place! I will have to check this more later when I have time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A quick suggestion would be to use simple names without punctuation characters etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They seem to have broken things once again without a reason...&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, it&#8217;s hard to tell what&#8217;s wrong from quick look but what I see that SOME virtual cameras disappeared, and some are still in their place! I will have to check this more later when I have time.</p>
<p>A quick suggestion would be to use simple names without punctuation characters etc.</p>
<p>They seem to have broken things once again without a reason&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bringing virtual DirectShow devices back to life with Skype 6 by Asgard324</title>
		<link>http://alax.info/blog/1433/comment-page-1#comment-5977</link>
		<dc:creator>Asgard324</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alax.info/blog/?p=1433#comment-5977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems that webcam detection is broken in Skype 6.3.0.105 again. Webcams which were usable with 6.1.0.129, are not detected anymore by 6.3.0.105.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems that webcam detection is broken in Skype 6.3.0.105 again. Webcams which were usable with 6.1.0.129, are not detected anymore by 6.3.0.105.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
