// Oprogramowanie Roman Ryltsov
NVIDIA consumer grade hardware provides support nowadays for – mostly – three concurrent sessions. The support matrix is provided here: Video Encode and Decode GPU Support Matrix | NVIDIA Developer. This small tool starts video encoding with given signal parameters (resolution, rate) and provides an easy way to measure load of GPU video encoding engine.…
Following previous post on AMD hardware video encoders, this shows how better NVIDIA hardware is in comparison. And they sell successor hardware series already!
AMD is not seemingly making any progress in improving video encoding ASICs on their video cards. New stuff looks pretty depressing. AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT was a bit of a move forward, a bit. New series look about the same but even slower a bit, however it is quite clear that existing cheaper NVIDIA…
Added a few more resolutions to NvcEncode tool. Resolutions above 4K are tried with H.264 codec but they are expected to not work since H.264 codec is limited to resolutions up to 4096 pixels in width or height. So the new ones apply to H.265/HEVC. They work pretty well on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER:…
I mentioned issues in AMD’s and Intel’s video encoding related drivers, APIs and integration components. Now I switched development box video card to NVIDIA’s and immediately hit their glitch too. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER offers really fast video encoder and consumer hardware from AMD and Intel is simply nowhere near. 3840×2160@144 video can be…
Not too bad, but it could come with a paycheck, I think.
In continuation of previous AMD AMF encoder latency at faster settings posts, side by side comparison to NVIDIA encoders. The numbers are to show how different they are even though they are doing something similar. The NVIDIA cards are not high end: GTX 1650 is literally the cheapest stuff among Turing 16xx series, and GeForce…